Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gladiators of Rome (2012 film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Electric Burst^{(Electron firings)}_(Zaps) 18:06, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gladiators of Rome (2012 film)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nominating for deletion as a page created by User:Mr. Lama, a confirmed sockpuppet of User:Giovannigiulio. Electric Burst^{(Electron firings)}_(Zaps) 00:17, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Created by a sock but edited since then from other editors with actual sourcing. Unless we want to WP:TNT this only to restore the text this doesn't seem to be a viable deletion candidate. Nate • (chatter) 00:45, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Cavarrone 05:45, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Cavarrone 05:45, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Cavarrone 05:45, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep and warn the nominator as they are mass-nominating/prodding all the articles of Mr. Lama, regardless of when they were created, regardless of who else edited them, regardless of their notability and even regardless of their actual sourcing. If Mr. Lama/Giovannigiulio was ever disruptive, nomitator is being disruptive as well, possibly more. In a case like this, G5 is clearly not eligible, notability is obvious, there is no improvement for the encyclopedia from the deletion of the article, and AfD like these are just a big waste of time for the community, who has better things to do. Cavarrone 05:45, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator note I think we're going to have to do a history merge with Not Born to Be Gladiators. An IP appears to have performed a cut and paste move in July. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 11:07, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

History merge has been carried out. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 12:19, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.